SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 410

R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, P.S.BRAHME
Jaisingh Asharfilal Yadav & others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - KHANDEPARKAR R.M.S., J.:---Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioners and the learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents. Perused the records.

2. The petitioners by the present petition seek to challenge the constitutionality of the provisions of law contained in the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (hereinafter called as "the said Act") allegedly declaring the Acts committed prior to its enforcement to be the offences under the said act as being violative of Article 20(1) of the Constitution of India and, therefore, seek to quash the proceedings against the petitioners initiated under the said Act allegedly on the basis of the acts committed by the petitioners prior to enforcement of the said Act.

3. Though the petition was filed on various grounds and even more grounds were added by way of amendment on two occasions, the challenge in the course of arguments was restricted to the ground of unconstitutionality of the expression "within the preceding period of ten years" in section 2(d) of the said Act contending that the same to be in contravention of the provisions of law contained in Article 20(1) of the Constitution as on account of t





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top