SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 721

D.B.BHOSALE, V.G.PALSHIKAR
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Murli Ramchand Puruswami & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - PALSHIKAR V.G., J.:---By this petition, the petitioner, State of Maharashtra, has challenged the order passed by the Special Court under the provisions of Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 on 15-3-2003 dismissing the application Exhibit 282 in TADA Sessions Case No. 8 of 1993.

2. TADA Sessions Case No. 8 of 1993 is pending before the Designated Court (TADA) at Pune. The said cases are pending for prosecution of the accused therein, some of whom are respondents herein. The charges include charge under section 5 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).

3. Exhibit 282 was filed in TADA Sessions Case No. 8 of 1993 by the Special Public Prosecutor for the State of Maharashtra under section 321 of the Criminal Procedure Code (hereinafter referred to as the Code). By this application the State sought withdrawal of prosecution under section 5 of the Act and requested transmission of the proceedings to regular Sessions Court as it no longer would remain a case triable only by the Special Court. This application was rejected by the learned Judge as aforesaid, which rejection is the subject matter



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top