P.S.BRAHME
Kanchanprasad Kashiprasad Shah – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
2. The case of prosecution is that prosecutrix Sushilabai Yadaorao Pimple (P.W. 1) went to Police Station, M.I.D.C., Nagpur on 11-9-1996 at noon and lodged report Exhibit 13 giving full narration of the incident of rape committed by the appellant on her. She supported her version in F.I.R. Exhibit 13 in her examination in the Court. It is stated by her that on 11-1-1996 around 11.00 a.m. she had gone for answering call of nature on the bank of Nallah which is situated near the premises of the company, where the complainant was working. The appellant came from her backside when she was in sitting position and answering the call of nature and he stood in front of her for passing urine. She asked the appellant as to whether it was proper for him to do so. She then went aside and sat for answ
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.