SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Bom) 445

C.K.THAKKER, B.H.MARLAPALLE, N.V.DABHOLKAR
Sanjay Govind Sapkal & others – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Dhule & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - THAKKER C.K., C.J.:---All these petitions have been placed for hearing before a Full Bench on a reference being made by a Division Bench consisting of one of us (B.H. Marllapale, J.) and N.H. Patil, J. In all the three petitions, a common question of law has been raised viz., the extent of power, authority and jurisdiction of the Collector under sub-section (1) of section 308 of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") to suspend an order or resolution passed by a Municipal Council.

2. To appreciate the controversy raised in the present group of petitions, few relevant facts in the first matter i.e. Writ Petition No. 1928 of 1996, Sanjay Govind Sapkal others v. The Collector of Dhule others, may be stated.

3. The said petition was filed by fourteen petitioners claimed to have been appointed by Municipal Council, Dhule, respondent No. 2 herein. The President of respondent No. 2-Council made several appointments between November 30, 1988 and December 21, 1989 as peons, clerks, cleaners, gardeners, etc. The Chief Officer of the Municipal Council, vide his letter No. Estt/974/89-90 dated





































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top