SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Bom) 934

D.S.ZOTING, S.B.MHASE
Shaikh Burhan Shaikh Mannu – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - MHASE S.B., J.:---Heard Mr. D.J. Choudhari, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. E.P. Savant, learned Government Pleader, for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and Mr. V.D. Salunke, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 5.

Rule. Respondents waive service. By consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, Rule made returnable forthwith.

2. This is a petition filed by one of sitting Directors of the respondent No. 5 Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Hingoli, which is established and functioning under the provisions of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963. The elections to the Board of Directors of the said Market Committee were held on 3-7-1997 and the first meeting of the Board of Directors was held on 13-8-1997. The terms of the Market Committee is of five years, and therefore, the term of the Board of Directors of the said Market Committee has come to an end on 12-8-2002. The Collector was expected to complete the elections before 12-8-2002. As there is failure on the part of the Collector to hold the elections, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking directions that the elections of the respondent No. 5 Market Committee be direct









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top