SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Bom) 128

N.V.DABHOLKAR
Union of India & others – Appellant
Versus
Maruti Madhav Kerulkar & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - Dabholkar N.V., J.:—Original defendant Nos. 1 to 4, the Union of India and authorities from Ministry of Defence, by this revision petition challenge the judgment and order dated 18-7-2001 in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No. 61/1998 passed by 2nd Additional District Judge, Ahmednagar, thereby confirming order dated 24-4-1998 passed by 2nd Joint Civil Judge (J.D.), Ahmednagar, in Regular Civil Suit No. 320/1997.

2. Present respondent Nos. 1 to 7 are original plaintiffs. Respondent, Nos. 8 to 10, three Grampanchayats are original defendant Nos. 6 to 8. Respondent No. 11- Collector, who was defendant No. 5 in the suit represents the State. [Henceforth parties shall be referred to as plaintiffs (respondent Nos. 1 to 7) defence authorities (revision petitioners), Grampanchyats (respondent Nos. 8 to 10 ) and the Collector, for the sake of brevity]

Plaintiffs approached the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar, by Regular Civil Suit No. 320/1997 for declaration and perpetual injunction. A declaration is sought that undertaking given by Gram panchayat Nagardeole (defendant No. 6- respondent No. 8 ) through its Sarpanch undertaking to surrender the use of roads X1, Y1 an









































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top