IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
J.G. Chitre, J.
Rohit Bhagchand Karnavat others .... Applicants.
Versus
State of Maharashtra.... Respondent.
Criminal Appln. Nos. 1918 1937 of 2002, decided on 21-6-2002.
Advocates appeared :
A.Y. Sakhare, Sr.A., Saraogi, for applicants.
B.R. Patil, A.P.P., for State.
Money Circulation Scheme - Criminal Application No. 1918 of 2002 - Price Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978, Section 2, Section 3, Section 4, Section 5 - The court discussed the provisions of the Price Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978, particularly focusing on the definitions of 'conventional chit' and 'money circulation scheme' under Section 2(a) and Section 2(c) respectively. The court analyzed the scheme in question and the arguments presented by the counsels to determine whether the activities of the company, its directors, and employees fell within the ambit of the Act. The court also referred to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the matter of State of West Bengal and others v. Swapan Kumar Guha and others to interpret the essential requirements of the penal provisions and the conditions for guilt under the Act.
Fact of the Case:
The Directors of 'M/s. Free India Concepts' sought anticipatory bail in connection with a complaint lodged under the Price Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978. The complaint alleged that the company's scheme involved circulation of money and violated the provisions of the Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court analyzed the nature of the scheme, the allegations, and the strength of the material collected by the investigating agency. It considered the definitions of 'conventional chit' and 'money circulation scheme' under the Act, and the arguments presented by the counsels. The court found that the applicants were entitled to anticipatory bail, imposing certain conditions to protect the interest of the prosecution.
Issues: The issues revolved around whether the activities of the company, its directors, and employees constituted a 'money circulation scheme' under the Price Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978, and whether the applicants were entitled to anticipatory bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the provisions of the Act, the analysis of the scheme in question, and the conditions for guilt under the Act as established in the judgment of the Supreme Court in the matter of State of West Bengal and others v. Swapan Kumar Guha and others.
Final Decision: The court allowed the applications for anticipatory bail, directing the officers of the Shahupuri Police Station, Kolhapur to release the applicants on bail with certain conditions to protect the interest of the prosecution.
2. The applicants are Directors of "M/s. Free India Concepts" having its head office at Babu Bhawan, 1st floor, Bala Sheth Madhukar Road, Opp. Elphinstone Road Railway Station, Elphinstone, Mumbai . They opened an office at Ichalkaranji near Gajanan Maharaj, Shegaon Temple initially. It seems to be their business by commercial activities to have the customers by way of a continuous chain for sale of their various articles which have been mentioned in the brochure annexed to the application. The scheme in short is that suppose a member of the public wants to become a customers of "M/s. Free India Concepts (hereinafter referred to as "Company" for convenience), he has to deposit Rs. 2000/- towards the part payment of the article which he may choose to purchase from the said company. In addition to that, he has to pay Rs. 500/- towards service charge. He would get a receipt in respect of payment of this sum of Rs. 2,500/- but would not get the article which he wants to purchase at that time because he has to follow further procedure of procuring two such customers for the company. This opens option for him of either to purchase the said article at such adjusted rate by adjustment of the commission which he would be getting by procuring those two customers or in the alternate he would be getting commission in the nature of cash. Those two customers brought by the initial customers would be also making the deposit of Rs. 2500/- and would be following the same scheme of procuring two more customers and the same would go on till the initial customer gets the article which he wants to purchase finally or would get his amount of commission in the nature of cash.
3. The employees of the said company used to give the demonstration of the scheme by exhibiting CD cassette and by addressing a informative lecture to prospective customers. One Arun Patil and Miss Bhojane were engaged in such activities when the complainant who lodged the complaint in Shahupuri Nagar Police Station named Yuvraj Babu Kamble visited the office of the company. He was explained the scheme by Arun Patil and Ms. Bhojane and was asked to join the said CD exhibition show as well as the informative address. By hearing this, the complainant who lodged the F.I.R. requested them to make him the member of the said scheme. He paid a sum of Rs. 2500/- and he got the receipt in respect of that. He was asked to bring two members. Mr. Yuvraj Babu Kamble went to his locality and searched for his members but could not get such members for 15 days. Thereafter he got some persons whom he brought to the shop of the company and the necessary information was shown to them by exhibition of the CD cassettee as well as by informative address of Arun Patil and Ms. Bhojane. Thereafter Yuvraj Babu Kamble could get two prospective customers whom he brought to the said office. They also paid the said sum of Rs. 2500/- each and receipts were passed in their favour. At that time Yuvraj Babu Kamble perhaps wanted to have the said amount in cash but he found the said article at that time but he was told to pay Rs. 570/- which was the amount payable by him after deducting the initial amount which was paid by him which was to the tune of Rs. 2000/- and the commission which accrued to him on account of the introduction of those two members. It seems that that hurt Yuvraj Babu Kamble and he thought he was cheated by the employees of the company and its Directors. Hence he went to the Shahupuri Police Station, Kolhapur and lodged the F.I.R. The said F.I.R. rolled the ball of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.