SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Bom) 910

V.G.PALSHIKAR
Nagorao alias Arun Narayan Yerwar & others – Appellant
Versus
Narayan Nagan Yerawar & another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - PALSHIKAR V.G., J.:---This revision application is directed against the order passed in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 6/95 passed on 6-8-1996 below (Exhibit 114) in Regular Civil Suit No. 56/92 whereby the order of status quo was granted. The learned Appellate Court vacating the order of status quo granted injunction in favour of the appellants before it and, therefore, the unsuccessful respondent has come up in revision under section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code.

2. When this matter came up for arguments, it was noticed that several revisions of such nature are pending in this Court. All these revisions challenged the orders passed by the trial Court and the Appellate Court either when they are concurrent or when they are reversing. The learned Counsel appearing in the above Revision Application No. 803/96 desired for some time to argue the matter. Accordingly, the matter was adjourned till today. In the meantime, the office also identified about 150 revision applications wherein identical question of law arose, namely, maintainability of all such revision applications after 1-7-2002 when the amended provisions of section 115 of the C.P.C. came into operation and the amende





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top