SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Bom) 654

D.D.SINHA
Nehru Jankalyan Bahu-Uddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha, through – Appellant
Versus
Mohan Suryabhan Wanjari & another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - D.D. SINHA, J.:---Heard Shri Parchure, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Shri Haq, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 1, and Shri Jichkar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent No. 2.

2. The petition is directed against the order dated 11-9-1998 passed by the School Tribunal in Appeal No. SEN/138/1995 whereby appeal preferred by the respondent No. 1 employee was allowed.

3. Shri Parchure, learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that the petitioner Sanstha runs various educational institutions, one of which is Nehru Vidyalaya and Junior College. The respondent No. 1 was appointed on 13-12-1990 as part time Lecturer in the Junior College. On 1-7-1991 two posts of Lecturer in Commerce Faculty were sanctioned in the Junior College. The respondent No. 1 was appointed as a part time Lecturer on clock hour basis. At the relevant time, the petitioner was holding qualification, i.e. M.Com., M.A. in Sociology and B.Ed. The said appointment was till the end of academic session, i.e. till 30-6-1992. The petitioner was again appointed in the post of Junior College Lecturer on 30-6-1992 on purely temporary basis for the academic session 1992-93. It is conte












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top