JUDGMENT - KOCHAR R.J., J.:---The petitioner employer is carrying on the business of international air transport. It is a foreign airlines company fully owned by the Royal Family of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The petitioner is aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 21st October, 1995 passed by the Industrial Court in Complaint U.L.P. No. 1296 of 1991 filed by the respondent who was employed as a security guard by the petitioner. The respondent employee complained of the unfair labour practice under Items 6 and 9 of Schedule IV of the M.R.T.U. and P.U.L.P. Act, 1971 in his complaint under section 28 read with section 30 of the Act. By the impugned order, the Industrial Court allowed the complaint and directed the petitioner to make the respondent employee permanent from the date on which he completed 240 days of service and also to pay him all the consequential benefits of permanency.

2. According to the respondent, he was appointed vide appointment letter dated 1st October, 1989 as a security guard on the terms and conditions stipulated in the said appointment letter for consolidated wage of Rs. 1400/- per month. One of the conditions was that the respondent would stand termin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document