IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
(AURANGABAD BENCH)
Marlapalle B.H. Smt. Tahilramani V.K., JJ.
Jalgaon District Fertilisers, Pesticides
and Seeds Dealers Association .... Petitioners.
Versus
State of Maharashtra others.... Respondents.
Writ Petition No. 1887 of 2000, decided on 22-10-2002.
Advocates appeared :
P.P. Bafna, for petitioners.
P.B. Patil, A.G.P., for State.
Pradeep Deshmukh, Additional Standing Counsel, for Union of India.
Seeds Act, 1966 - State Government's Power to Impose Conditions - The court upheld the State Government's power to impose conditions for granting licences for sale/import of seeds, including the requirement for Diploma/Degree holders in Agriculture or firms employing such qualified persons. The court found that the State Government, as the licensing authority designated under the Seeds (Control) Order, 1983, has the power to impose reasonable conditions to ensure quality control of seeds and fertilizers.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, an association of dealers in fertilizers, pesticides, and seeds, challenged a communication by the State Government requiring licences for sale/import of seeds to be granted to Diploma/Degree holders in Agriculture or firms employing such qualified persons.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the State Government, as the licensing authority designated under the Seeds (Control) Order, 1983, has the power to impose reasonable conditions for granting licences, including the requirement for Diploma/Degree holders in Agriculture or firms employing such qualified persons. The court held that such conditions are in the public interest for quality control of seeds and fertilizers.
Issues: Challenge to the communication dated 22nd March, 1999 by the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: The State Government, as the licensing authority designated under the Seeds (Control) Order, 1983, has the power to impose reasonable conditions for granting licences, including the requirement for Diploma/Degree holders in Agriculture or firms employing such qualified persons, to ensure quality control of seeds and fertilizers.
Final Decision: The petition was rejected, and the challenge to the communication dated 22nd March, 1999 was deemed unsustainable.
2. Shri Bafna, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the State Government cannot abrogate itself the powers of the Central Government and it is the Central Government alone which can impose such conditions as the Seeds Act, 1966 has been enacted by the Parliament.
3. Admittedly, the Seeds (Control) Order, 1983 has been issued by the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and Clause 3 therein states that no person shall carry on the business of selling, exporting or importing seeds at any place except under and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the licence granted to him under the said Order. There is also no dispute that the licencing authority is the State Government and it has also the powers of granting exemptions. An application for licence is required to be made in Form-A as has been set out in Clause 4 and the licence is issued in Form-B as stated in Clause 5 of the said Order of 1983. The issue of renewal of licence is covered under the provisions of Clause 7.
4. If the State Government has been designated as the licencing authority under the Order of 1983 it certainly has the powers to impose reasonable conditions while issuing licences or renewing the same so as to ensure that the licensees operate within the specified terms and conditions, in addition to the terms and conditions which are stated in Form-B to the said order. The order does not state anywhere that the said conditions appended to Form-B are exhaustive and no other conditions could be added by the licencing authority taking into consideration the local conditions.
5. Quality control of seeds and fertilisers is of great importance for arresting the degradation of soil, environment, water as well as the seeds and, therefore, if the State Government in its wisdom has decided that the licences should be granted to the candidates who hold the degree/diploma in agriculture or to the firms which agree to employ such qualified persons, we do not find anything wrong in such a decision. The Control Order, 1983 does not come in the way of the State Government in imposing such conditions, which are, to our mind, in public interest.
6. Under the circumstances the challenge to the communication dated 22nd March, 1999 is unsustainable and, therefore, the petition is rejected.
Petition dismissed.
-----
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.