SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Bom) 821

A.M.KHANWILKAR
D. V. Panse & another – Appellant
Versus
Laxminarayan Khar & another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.:---These writ petitions, under Article 227 of Constitution of India, take exception to the judgment and decree passed by the 7th Additional District Judge, Pune, dated 30th October, 1995 in Civil Appeal No. 53 of 1990. The respondents in Writ Petition No. 786 of 1976 and petitioners in Writ Petition No. 1685 of 1997 are the landlords in respect of the premises forming part of house No. 4, Nehru Marg, Ghorpadi, Pune (hereinafter referred to as the "landlords"). The petitioners in Writ Petition No. 786 of 1996 and respondents in Writ Petition No. 1685 of 1997 were inducted in the suit premises as "tenants" by the former landlord (hereinafter referred to as the "tenants"). The landlords purchased the suit property whereafter the tenancy was attorned in their favour. The landlords filed the subject suit in the Court of Small Causes, Pune being Civil Suit No. 1560 of 1986 for possession of the suit premises on the ground of default, conduct of the tenants amounting to nuisance and annoyance and for reasonable and bona fide requirement. The said suit was contested by the tenants. The trial Court by judgment and decree dated 8th November, 1989 was pleased to

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top