SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Bom) 961

R.J.KOCHAR
Ramchandra Narayan Rao – Appellant
Versus
Sub-Divisional Officer, Mandur – Respondent


JUDGMENT - R.J. KOCHAR, J.:---The petitioner, the most unfortunate creature, who is a called citizen under our Constitution and an integral and inseparable constituent of the "We the People" is being tossed ruthlessly from one Court to another Court. Not by a private employer but by the authorities of our Welfare State. In the year 1990 the State has taken away from him his land approximately admeasuring eight acres, the only source of his livelihood. He is now put in the category of Project Affected Persons, vide letter dated 10-4-2000 addressed by the District Rehabilitation Officer. No doubt he might have been given compensation in accordance with law but in my opinion compensation is no substitute for the land. The compensation gets evaporated soon while the land continues as mother land-source of livelihood for generations. To help such persons our welfare State has provided for giving jobs to all such persons whose land was or is taken by the State for different projects and for different public purposes. Even job which many times is temporary is no substitute for the land as the employee retires at some point of time while the land gets inheritated down to the generations as






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top