SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 67

S.A.BOBDE
Mahadu alias Mahadeo Baji Bhosale – Appellant
Versus
Appaji Gunbarao @ Ganpatrao & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - BOBDE S.A., J.:---By this petition the defendant/judgment Debtor challenges the order of the District Court, Ratnagiri dismissing his appeal by which he had made a grievance about the manner in which the Collector had effected the partition after a decree had been passed by the Civil Court.

2. The respondents here i.e. Appaji Gulabrao @ Ganpatrao Bhosale, since deceased, now represented by his legal representatives and others had instituted a Regular Civil Suit No. 50 of 1971 against the petitioner and some others, who are defendants. The parties to the suit were related to each other. The suit resulted in decree to the effect that the suit land should be divided equally between the contesting parties i.e. the plaintiff would be entitled to a half share and the defendants should be entitled to another half.

3. This decree was passed in accordance with the consent terms entered into by the parties. The consent terms referred to the properties in possession of the parties. Clause 5 of the consent terms provided that the partition should be made as far as possible having regard to the present position of the property. It is this clause which has mainly give rise to the presen














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top