SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Bom) 1075

A.M.KHANWILKAR
Darachand Harakchand Oswal & others – Appellant
Versus
Suresh Waman Karmarkar & another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - KHANWILKAR A.M., J.:---This writ petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, takes exception to the judgment and order passed by the IIIrd Additional District Judge, Pune, dated 31st January, 1989 in Civil Appeal No. 940 of 1986. The premises in question comprises of single room admeasuring 10 x 12 ft bearing C.T.S. No. 350/1-8 situated at Somwar Peth, Pune. The petitioners instituted a suit for possession of the suit premises on the ground of default, tenant having secured alternate accommodation of residence and unlawful subletting, being Civil Suit No. 797 of 1984. That suit was decreed by the trial Court on 28-4-1986 only on the ground of respondents-tenants having secured alternative residential accommodation within the meaning of section 13(1)(1) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Bombay Rent Act). The respondents carried the matter in appeal being Civil Appeal No. 940 of 1986. The Appellate Court however has reversed the decree for possession and instead dismissed the suit. It is not in dispute that petitioners did not challenge the finding with regard to the other two grounds. In so f





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top