SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 100

R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
Vinay Asharam Rathi – Appellant
Versus
M. S. Rao & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - KHANDEPARKAR R.M.S., J.:---Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. Perused the records. The grievance of the petitioner relates to non-compliance of the orders issued by the Metropolitan Magistrate, First Class under section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter called as the said Code). Pursuant to the said complaint, notices were issued to the respondents to answer the charge of contempt for non-compliance of the orders dated 31st May, 2000 and 7th April, 2000 issued by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Mumbai, as prima facie, it appeared, that inspite of specific direction to complete the investigation into the complaints filed by the petitioner and to submit the charge-sheet or the summary report, as the case may be, at earliest possible, there was no compliance of the said orders till 1st June, 2001. Consequent to such notices, affidavit-in-reply was filed on behalf of the respondents by one Rajan Dhobole, Senior Police Inspector attached to M.R.A. Marg Police Station, Mumbai. In the course of hearing, additional affidavits came to be filed by Murlidhar S. Rao, the respondent No. 1, R.K. Kasbekar, Inspector of Police, L.A-II, Worli, Mumbai as w
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top