SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Bom) 1186

D.B.BHOSALE
Nilesh Jap Daru – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT - BHOSALE D.B., J.:-Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has filed this application under section 407 of Cri.P.C seeking transfer of Sessions Case No. 272 of 1996 from the Court presided over by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Shri A.R. Mahajan to any other Sessions Court in Mumbai Division. The application filed by the petitioner seeking transfer under section 408, bearing Misc. Application No. 833 of 2004, has been rejected by the judgment and order dated 16-7-2004 rendered by the Principal Judge of the Court of Sessions for Greater Bombay.

3. According to the petitioner, the conduct of the learned Judge and his attitude towards him, most clearly evidenced by the events of 10-6-04 and 11-6-04, has given rise to a strong and reasonable apprehension in his mind that the learned Sessions Judge is determined to take him into custody on some pretext or the other. In short, according to the petitioner, the conduct of the concerned learned Sessions Judge has resulted in his loosing faith that he would have a fair and unbiased trial at his hands. The petitioner has, therefore, prayed that it would not be in the interest of justice nor would it convey an












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top