S.T.KHARCHE
Baliram Rupaji Nagulkar – Appellant
Versus
Ganpat Kashiba Tadas – Respondent
2. Brief facts are required to be stated as under:
The parties are resident of the same village Sawargaon and the relation between them are cordial. On 1-2-1981 the defendant is said to have taken a hand loan of Rs. 5,000/- to meet his household and agricultural expenses and executed usanwar chitthi in favour of the plaintiff. This loan amount was demanded by notice dated 19-1-1983 to which the defendant gave reply on 3-2-1983 and refused to pay the amount of loan and therefore, the plaintiff filed suit for recovery of the said hand loan of Rs. 5,000/- on the basis of usanwar chitthi. The defendant strongly resisted the contentions of the plaintiff and contended that the usanwar chitthi is attested by two witnesse
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.