S.J.VAZIFDAR
Sanjay Kanubhai Patel – Appellant
Versus
Chief Controlling Revenue Authority & another – Respondent
2. The petitioner submitted in the office of the Superintendent of Stamps, Mumbai on 30th March, 1999, under the New Amnesty Scheme declared by the State Government on 26th September, 1998, a document for payment of proper stamp duty. The document referred to was executed on a non-judicial Stamp paper of Rs. 20/- only. The Superintendent of Stamps by an order dated 21-5-02 concluded that the document was a partnership deed attracting stamp duty under Articles 47(1)(b) and 47(1)(c) of Schedule I of the Bombay stamp Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). The duty was assessed at Rs. 12,51,650/- alongwith a fine of Rs. 300/- and subject to the conditions laid down in the Amnesty Scheme. The petitioner preferred an Appeal against the said order before the first respondent. As stated above, the first respondent confirmed the order of the Superintendent of Stamps.
3. Before referring to the document, it is necessary to set out the Articles in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.