SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Bom) 354

D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
Ujawala Athare (Patil) – Appellant
Versus
Asha Ravindra Paranjape (Dr. ) – Respondent


JUDGMENT - CHANDRACHUD D.Y. (Dr.), J.:—Rule, returnable forthwith. Respondents waive service. By consent, taken up for hearing and final disposal.

2. On 14th February, 2002 the respondent instituted a suit in the Court of small causes at Pune against the petitioner for the recovery of arrears of rent and for possession of immovable property bearing Block No. 1 situated on the ground floor of a bungalow on plot No. 94 of Shri Shivaji Co-op. Housing Society, Off Senapati Bapat Road, Pune. The summons in the suit was served on 4th March, 2002. The date fixed for filing the written statement in the suit was 9th July, 2002. On that date, the trial Judge passed an order of "no written statement" and directed that the suit shall proceed without a written statement. The suit was adjourned to 23rd July, 2002. On 24th July, 2002 an application was filed on behalf of the petitioner for setting aside the no written statement order that had been passed on 9th July, 2002. The respondent objected to the application in a reply dated 3rd September, 2002. By the impugned order dated 22nd January, 2003, the trial Judge dismissed the application. The learned trial Judge held that upon the amendment eff


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top