SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Bom) 1026

A.M.KHANWILKAR
Madhukar Deoman Patil, etc. – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - KHANWILKAR A.M., J.:-The short question that arises for consideration in the present writ petitions is whether the Commissioner is competent to pass order of disqualification on his own against the Elected Councillors.

2. Briefly stated, in all these matters, the petitioners are duly Elected Councillors of the Malegaon Municipal Corporation. Respondent No. 3- Commissioner-issued show cause notice to each of them, in all 14 elected councillors on December 6, 2003. The show cause notice essentially is founded on the allegation that the respective Councillors have incurred disqualification in terms of section 10(1)(f) of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949. The respective Councillors, petitioners herein, filed their explanation to the said show cause notice. The Commissioner was not satisfied with the explanation offered by the petitioners. However, instead of making reference of the issue as to whether the concerned elected Councillors have incurred disqualification to the Judge, as was required under section 12(1) of the Act, the Commissioner himself proceeded to pass order of disqualification on 31st March, 2004 against each of them. Those orders are su










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top