IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
(PANAJI BENCH)
Radhakrishnan S. Hardas P.V., JJ.
Shri Chandreshwar Bhuthanath Devastan of Paroda
by its special attorney Madhukar Narayan Raut Desai .... Appellant.
Versus
Subiraj Prabhakar Naik others.... Respondents.
Letters Patent Appeal No. 7 of 1996 with Cross Objection No. 6 of 1996, decided on 18-9-2002.
Advocates appeared :
M.S. Usgaonkar, Sr.A. with V.P. Thali in L.P.A. No. 7/1996, for appellant in Cross Objection No. 6/1996, respondent.
S.G. Dessai, Sr.A. with M. Shirodkar in L.P.A. No. 7/1996, for respondents in Cross Objection No. 6/1996, for appellants.
S.K. Kakodkar Sr.A. with S.G. Bhobe J.J. Desouza, in L.P.A. No. 7/1996, for intervenors.
M.B. DCosta with J.A. Lobo, in L.P.A. No. 7/1996, for intervenors.
A.N.S. Nadkarni, A.G., in L.P.A. No. 7/1996, for State of Goa.
General Clauses Act, 1897
- Section 6 - Restriction to further appeal. - Section 6 of the Act is applicable as the expression without prejudice to generality of provisions of Section 6 is used in Section 16(2) of Amendment Act of 2000 does not wholly save vested rights of appeal in parties to suit instituted prior to 1.7.2000 on face of clear intention of Section 100-A of Code. [Rahul Sharad Awasthi v. Ratnakar Trimbak Pandit, 2004 (5) Bom CR 50 (FB)].
- Section 6 - Amendment of pending Letter Patent appeals. - Contention that right of appeal is a vested right and in view of Section 6 of General Clauses Act cannot be taken away by amendment of 2002 in CPC is not tenable. Section 100-A, CPC has destroyed even vested right of single Judge in appellate or original juris- diction.
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Section 100-A (Amended in 2002) - Letters Patent Appeal. - Since right of Letters Patent Appeal against orders of single Judge is not a vested right hence it can be taken away under Section 100-A of CPC (Amended Act).
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Section 100-A - Section 100-A - Letters Patent Appeal. - When appeal against order of single Judge involves substantial question of law then a certificate for agitating matter can be granted by Court under Article 134 of Constitution
2. The only issue which has been argued is whether any of the pending letters patent appeals which have already been admitted by this Court are also covered by the said section 100-A as mentioned hereinabove, in the sense whether pending admitted letters patent appeals survive in view of the aforesaid amendment or not.
3. To appreciate the contentions with regard to the above issue, it would be relevant to quote section 100-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 which for the first time by this Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1976 by section 38, was incorporated as under:-
"Section 100-A. No further appeal in certain cases.---Notwithstanding anything contained in any letters patent for any High Court or in any other instrument having the force of law or in any other law for the time being in force, where any appeal from an appellate decree or order is heard and decided by a Single Judge of a High Court, no further appeal shall lie from the judgment, decision or order of such Single Judge in such appeal or from any decree passed in such appeal."
4. In the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1976 by section 97 there was repeal and savings which reads as under:-
"Section 97. Repeal and savings.---(1) Any amendment made, or any provision inserted in the principal Act by State Legislature or a High Court before the commencement of this Act shall except in so far as such amendment or provision is consistent with the provisions of the principal Act as amended by this Act, stand repealed.
(2) Notwithstanding that the provisions of this Act have come into force or the repeal under sub-section (1) has taken effect, and without prejudice to the generality of the provisions of section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 (10 of 1897),
(m) the provisions of section 100 of the principal Act, as substituted by section 37 of this Act, shall not apply to or affect any appeal from an appellate decree or order which had been admitted before the commencement of the said section 37 after hearing under Rule 11 of Order XLI: and every such admitted appeal shall be dealt with as if the said section 37 had not come into force,
(n) section 100-A, as inserted in the principal Act, by section 38 of this Act, shall not apply to or affect any appeal against the decision of a Single Judge of a High Court under any letters patent which had been admitted before the commencement of the said section 38: and every such admitted appeal shall be disposed of as if the said section 38 had not come into force.
(3) Save as otherwise provided in sub-section (2), the provisions of the principal Act, as amended by this Act, shall apply to every suit, proceeding, appeal or application, pending at the commencement of this Act or instituted or filed after such commencement withstanding the fact that the right, or cause of action, in pursuance of which such suit, proceeding, appeal or application is instituted or filed, had been acquired or had accrued before such commencement."
5. Subsequent thereto, there is a further amendment to the Code of Civil Procedure by the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1999 whereby section 100-A was substituted which substituted section 100-A reads as under:-
"100-A. No further appeal in certain cases.---Notwithstanding anything contained in any letters patent for any High Court or in any other instrument having the force of law or in any other law for the time being in force,"
(a) where any appeal from an original or appellate decree or ord
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.