SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 872

R.J.KOCHAR, A.P.DESHPANDE
Raju Pundlikrao Burde – Appellant
Versus
Establishment Officer (III-B),Maharashtra State Electricity Board & another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - DESHPANDE A.P., J.:---Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent of parties.

2. Heard Shri N.C. Phadnis, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri R.K. Deshpande, learned Counsel for the respondents.

3. The petitioner is in the employment of Maharashtra State Electricity Board. The petitioner joined as a Junior Engineer with MSEB on 10-2-1986, as a candidate belonging to Scheduled Tribe category. The petitioner had sought the said appointment on the basis of a caste certificate issued by the Executive Magistrate, which was validated by the appellate authority viz. Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpur in Appeal No. 26 of 1982, vide order dated 31st May, 1982. It is not in dispute that when the petitioners caste certificate was referred for verification and scrutiny to the Director of Social Welfare, Maharashtra State, Pune, the same was rejected by the said authority which is corresponding to the Caste Scrutiny Committee. Then, in the year 1981-82, an order in regard to verification of caste claim passed by the Director of Social Welfare, Pune was subject to an appellate remedy before the Divisional Commissioner. In the present case, as stated hereinabove














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top