SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 684

R.J.KOCHAR, S.T.KHARCHE
Anil Dattatraya Ade – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, Amravati & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - KOCHAR R.J., J.:---The petitioner, a Lecturer by profession, employed in the respondent No. 2-Institute is aggrieved by the judgment and order passed, by the Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, Amravati, and Aurangabad, on 16th January, 1986 in Appeal No. 43/1984 filed by him under section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Non-Government Schools (Conditions of Service.) Regulation Act, 1977, hereinafter referred to as "the Act". The learned Presiding Officer partly allowed the appeal. The petitioners challenge to the legality and propriety of the order of termination dated 29-6-1984 was not accepted by the Tribunal, as it recorded a finding that the said order of termination was legal and valid, but the learned Presiding Officer granted relief of one months salary (pay and allowances) in lieu of the notice to be paid by the respondent No. 2 within a reasonable time of two months, with further direction to the Government to deduct the said amount, if not paid from the grant-in-aid of the respondent No. 2. In effect the petitioner had failed to get any substantial relief in his appeal and he has, therefore, challenged the impugned judgment and order under Article 226 of th












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top