SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 509

R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, P.S.BRAHME
Parvatabai Bhaurao Gaikwad & others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - KHANDEPARKAR R.M.S., J.:---Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. Perused the records.

2. Complaining about failure on the part of the respondents to protect the fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, in relation to the son of the petitioner No. 1, namely Suresh, the petitioners seek direction for investigation through Central Bureau of Investigation regarding the whereabouts of her son Suresh, as well as for grant of compensation to the tune of Rs. 5,00,000/- to the petitioner No. 1.

3. It is the case of the petitioners that the petitioner No. 1 is a widow and Suresh was her eldest son amongst four children, viz. two sons and two daughters. Said Suresh was a student of Vikas Vidyalaya, Shankarapur. While he was in 12th standard, on the basis of a false complaint lodged by Smt. Mamta Dilip Dange, the Police Out Post at Shankarapur arrested Suresh in exercise of powers under sections 151(1), 107 and 116(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for taking punitive action. He was produced before Naib Tahsildar of Chimur, District Chandrapur and was ordered to be detained in custody in Cental Jail, Chandrapur, on























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top