SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 1330

R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J.P.DEVADHAR
Chinai (Mrs. ) (nee Miss Alpana Piramal) – Appellant
Versus
Income-Tax Officer – Respondent


JUDGMENT - DEVADHAR J.P., J.:---This Tax Appeal is filed by the appellant/assessee under section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 relating to Assessment Year 86-87.

2.According to the assessee, the following substantial questions of law do arise out of the order of the Tribunal. They are:

(1) Whether in determining the capital gains chargeable to tax can the Assessing Officer have regard to a so called notional benefit in determining the full value of the consideration that accrues or arises as a result of the transfer?

(2) Whether capital gains would be chargeable only on the full value of the monetary consideration accruing or arising to an assessee and whether any incidental or remote benefit which benefit does not flow directly to the appellant is to be ignored in determining the chargeability to tax of the capital gains?

(3) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances the Tribunal was justified in holding that the full value of the consideration accruing to the appellant on the transfer of the shares of Piramal Rasayan Limited would be Rs. 16,23,000/- and not rupee 1/- which was the amount that the appellant received as a result of the transfer:

(4) Whether the Tribunal having foun
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top