S.T.KHARCHE
B & C Kamgar Sanghatna – Appellant
Versus
Executive Engineer & others – Respondent
2. Relevant facts are as under :
Respondent No. 1, The Executive Engineer of P.W.D., Amravati, and respondent No. 2. The State of Maharashtra, own a premises at Amravati, out of which the petitioner was inducted into the possession of one room for the purpose of running its union office. The respondent No. 3, R.D.C., is the Competent Authority for initiation of the eviction proceedings under the Eviction Act and, as such, issued a notice as per Rule 3 of the Bombay Governmen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.