SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Bom) 96

A.P.DESHPANDE, V.G.MUNSHI
Baburao Dadarao Kolhe & others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - DESHPANDE A.P., J.: - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent of parties.

2. The present petition has been field in a representative capacity for and on behalf of the workers, working with the third respondent-Godavari Dudhana Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana, which has gone in liquidation. The order passed in this petition relates to all the employees, who were in the employment of the respondent No. 4 and who had initiated proceeding before Industrial Court, for claiming arrears of wages, by filing the complaint under section 28, sub-section (1) read with Item 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

Initially, on 18-9-2001, 243 workers filed a complaint under section 28, read with Item 9 of Schedule IV, of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions had Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as M.R.T.U. P.U.L.P. Act, 1971) before the Industrial Court, making a demand as regard to their wages for about sixty months, which according to the employees, were to paid by the third respondent, as they were facing the financial crunch. Similar complaints, came to be f







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top