J.P.DEVADHAR, V.C.DAGA
Span Diagnostics Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
2. Since the issues raised in all these references are common, they are heard together and are disposed of by this common judgment.
3. The common questions of law referred by the Tribunal under section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act in all these references are as follows :
SALES TAX REFERENCE Nos. 2, 3 4 of 1999
1. Whether the Tribunal is justified in holding that the sales of "Pathological diagnostics reagents" are covered by the residuary Entry 102 of Part II of Schedule C to the Act and not covered by purview of Entry 24 of Part I of Schedule C ?
2. That whether the Tribunal is justified in discarding all the evidence placed on record by the applicant ?
4. It was the contention of the applicant before the adjudicating authority that the Diagnostic Reagents manufactured and sold by them during the financial year 1983-1984, 1984-1985 and 1985-86 were covered under the Entry 2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.