SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 1046

S.A.BOBDE
Chaganlal Tarachand Rai – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - BOBDE S.A., J.:---Heard Mrs. Sirpurkar, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Shri Deopujari, learned A.G.P. for the State.

2.The petitioner apparently started using 263 sq. mts. of land in Survey No. 195 of Nerpersopant for non-agricultural purpose. He did not obtain any permission for converting the use of this land for non-agricultural purpose. The non-agricultural purpose for which he put the land for commercial and residential.

3.The Tahsildar, therefore, issued a show cause notice to him. Even though the land belonged to the Gram Panchayat, no notice was issued to the Gram Panchayat. In addition to replying to show cause notice to explain why he is using the land for non-agricultural purpose. The petitioner also made an application for regularising the use of the land for non-agricultural purpose. By merely consulting the other charges, the Additional Tahsildar regularised unauthorised use of the land for non-agricultural purpose, in exercise of his powers under sections 45, 47(b) and 114 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 (for short "the Code"). In pursuance to the regularisation, the Additional Tahsildar granted a Sanad under section 44 of the Code.

4.In t


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top