SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Bom) 183

V.G.PALSHIKAR, P.V.KAKADE
Suresh Kisan Ude – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT - PALSHIKAR V.G., J.:—Being aggrieved by the judgment and order of conviction passed on 13-7-1999 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 408 of 1998 convicting the accused under section 302 of I.P.C. and sentencing him to suffer R.I. for life, the appellant has filed this appeal on the ground mentioned in the memo of appeal as also verbally canvassed by the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the accused/appellant.

2.With the assistance of the learned Counsel for the defence and the learned Prosecutor we have scrutinised the evidence and have reappreciated the evidence on record.

3.The prosecution story as emerges from the reappreciation of the evidence stated briefly is that the accused and his wife were both working as labourers and making their livelihood. They were last seen together by their employer on 5th May, 1998 and thereafter on 6th May, 1998 a dead body was found floating in a water tank near the construction site. Enquiries revealed that it was the dead body of the wife of the accused and therefore accused was arrested and on investigation prosecuted under section 302 of I.P.C.

4.The prosecution has examined 9 witnesses to prove its case,









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top