SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 1428

F.I.REBELLO, N.V.DABHOLKAR
Avinash Pandurang Tarawade & others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - REBELLO F.I., J.:-The petitioners have filed the present petition to challenge the action of respondent No. 2, the Cantonment board, Aurangabad, which has imposed a tax styled as "Vehicle Entry Tax". The petitioners aver that they are residents of Aurangabad and are engaged in the business of transport. Respondent No. 3 is the Contract, to whom the contract to collect vehicle Entry Tax has been allotted. Respondent No. 4 is Union of India who, according to the petitioners, has granted sanction to respondent No. 2 to impose the Vehicle Entry Tax. The petitioners are engaged in transport business and use their vehicle for transportation of the employees of various industries situated at Waluj Industrial area from Aurangabad to Waluj and from Waluj to Aurangabad. The vehicles of the petitioners when used for that purpose, are required to use the Aurangabad-Pune Road, which passes through Aurangabad Cantonment Area, Aurangabad. The respondent No. 2 Cantonment Board had issued draft notification for imposing the vehicle entry tax on entry of vehicle within the limits of Aurangabad Cantonment which was published on 24-4-2003. Objections were invited by the said notification as





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top