A.M.KHANWILKAR
Arjun Dada Gadage – Appellant
Versus
Mallappa Gurappa Chougule & another – Respondent
2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, by consent.
3. As short question is involved, the matter is taken for final hearing forthwith, by consent.
4. Respondent No. 1 has died long back during the pendency of the proceedings before the lower Court. In this view of the matter, Counsel for the petitioner orally prays for permission to delete respondent No. 1. As per oral request, petitioner is allowed to delete respondent No. 1 at his risk. Amendment be carried out forthwith.
5. This petition takes exception to the judgment and order passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Kurundwad dated October 8, 2001 below Exhibit 45 in R.C.S. No. 66 of 1985. The respondent along with the deleted respondent No. 1 has filed suit for permanent injunction and declaration before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, being Regular Suit No. 66 of 1985. In the said suit, application for interim relief (Exhibit 5) was filed, which was, however, rejected. The matter was carried in appeal by the respondents, which appeal was also dismissed by the District Court on July 8, 1986. While considering that appeal, the District Court has dealt with the contention raised on be
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.