SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 595

A.P.SHAH, D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
Mukesh Gupta – Appellant
Versus
SICOM Ltd – Respondent


JUDGMENT - SHAH A.P., J.:---This appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 4-12-2002 passed by Deshmukh, J., in Summons for Judgment No. 466 of 2000 in Summary Suit No. 2005 of 1999.

2. The appellant is defendant and respondent is plaintiff -SICOM. Respondent had entered into an agreement dated 101-1995 with Lloyd Finance Ltd., hereinafter referred to as the "company". Under that contract an amount of Rs. 10 crores was advanced as a loan to the company. It was repayable in two instalments of Rs. 5 crores each commencing at the end of two years from the date of distribution of the said loan. The loan was disbursed on 10-1-1995. Accordingly, the said loan was repayable in two equal instalments of Rs. 5 crores each, on 5-1-1997 and 5-1-1998. The company paid first instalment i.e. Rs. 5 crores on the due date. However, the company committed default in payment of second instalment. One of the terms of the agreement between the respondent and the company was that the appellant gives an irrevocable and personal guarantee to the respondent guaranteeing repayment of the said loan. The guarantee agreement was accordingly executed between the appellant and the respondent on 10-


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top