SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 688

A.P.SHAH, D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
Bhenoy G. Dembla & another – Appellant
Versus
Prem Kutir P. Ltd – Respondent


JUDGMENT - Dr. CHANDRACHUD D.Y., J.:---On 14th February, 2003 Justice D.K. Deshmukh allowed an appeal filed by the respondent under section 10-F of the Companies Act, 1956 against an order of the Company Law Board. The maintainability of a Letters Patent Appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge has been questioned having regard to the amendment to section 100-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

2. The appellants filed an application under section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956 against the refusal of the respondent to register the transfer of certain shares in their names. The appellants had entered into an agreement for the sale of Flat 6-C in a building known as Premkutir, at Backbay Reclamation in Mumbai on 2nd October, 1993. The respondent having refused to accede to the transfer of 55 equity shares and in view of the provisions of Article 40-A of the Articles of Association of the company which stipulate that the ownership of shares of the respondent is essential for the occupation of a flat, the appellants moved an application before the Company Law Board under section 111 of the Act. The Company Law Board held in favour of the appellants by its order dated 23rd


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top