SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 292

V.M.KANADE
Asudamal Laxmandas Sindhi – Appellant
Versus
Kisanrao Wamanrao Dharmale & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - KANADE V.M., J.:---None appears on behalf of the respondents though served. Notice before admission was issued on 17-9-1990. This notice was served on the respondent Nos. 1 to 7. Thereafter, the matter was admitted on 10-4-1991. Notice on merits was served on the respondents and legal heirs of respondent No. 3 on 10-7-1992. Further all respondents have been served again on 10-4-2000. This is an old matter of 1990. The original suit was filed in the year 1978, in this view of the matter, the matter is heard finally.

2. This is a second appeal filed by the appellant, who is the original plaintiff, challenging the judgment and order of the Second Additional District Judge, Amravati, who set aside the judgment and decree passed by the Second Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Daryapur.

3. Brief facts are as follows:

The original plaintiff filed a Regular Civil Suit No. 126 of 1978 for specific performance of contract or in the alternative for refund of earnest money with damages. It was the case of the original plaintiff that the defendant Wamanrao s/o Anyaji Dharmale entered into an agreement of sale of suit Survey No. 49/2 admeasuring 2 acres, 34 gunthas of village Thillory

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top