JUDGMENT - KHANDEPARKAR R.M.S., J.:---Heard the Advocates for the parties. Perused the records.

2. Whether the Clause No. 49 of 1956 settlement stands replaced by Clause No. 19 of 1985 settlement and by Resolution No. 8856 of the appellant Corporation, or whether the Clause No. 49 of 1956 settlement operates in the field totally different from the one in which Clause 19 of the 1985 settlement operates, are the common questions of law which arise for consideration in all these letters patent appeals and on account of difference of opinion between two Benches of this Court on the said points, the matter had been ordered to be heard finally and decided by the Full Bench and that is how, all these matters were heard by this bench, and are being disposed of by this judgment.

3. The appellant Corporation is the State undertaking and the respondents are the employees of the said Corporation. Apart from the State Transport Employees Service Regulations framed under section 45 of the Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950, the service conditions of the respondents/employees are also regulated by the settlements signed between the Corporation and various Unions representing the employees of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document