RADHAKRISHNAN S., J.:---By this Appeal, the appellant Company is challenging an order dated 29th March, 2003 whereby the learned Judge of the Bombay City Civil Court has dismissed the Notice of Motion and has declined to grant any interim relief in favour of the appellant-company. It may be noted here that in this matter, the ad interim relief in terms of prayer Clauses (a) and (b) of the Notice of Motion No. 4541 of 2001 was granted by the Bombay City Civil Court in favour of the appellants on 23rd October, 2001. The said prayer Clauses (a) and (b) of the Notice of Motion No. 4541 of 2001 read as under :-

(a) That pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit defendants and the other activists of the Narmada Bachao Andolan be restrained by an order and injunction of this Hon'ble Court from making any statements, declarations, utterances, writings and publications in the media regarding the Maheshwar Project which are defamatory of the plaintiff.

(b) That pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit the defendants and/or other activists of the Narmada Bachao Andolan be restrained by an order and injunction of this Hon'ble Court from issuing defamatory Press Notes against t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document