SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 591

A.M.KHANWILKAR
Balaleshwar Shikshan Mandal & another – Appellant
Versus
Jaywant Bhaguji Gadekar & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - KHANWILKAR A.M., J.:---Pursuant to the notice issued on 22-10-2002 this matter posted today for final disposal. The respondents have been do served. Parties have exchanged their pleadings. Arguments of Counsel for the parties were advanced for final disposal consent. In the circumstances, rule. Rule made returns forthwith, by consent.

2. This writ petition under Article 227 takes exception to judgment and order passed by the School Tribunal, Pune Region, dated 25-6-2002 in Appeal No. 104 of 1998.

3. Briefly stated, the respondent No. 1 was appointed as Assistant Teacher in the petitioner school. Initially, appointment of the respondent No. 1 was on temporary basis against reserved post. The Tribunal has, however, found that letter Exhibit 19 the respondent No. 1 was appointed against clear and permanent vacancy on probation. Be that as it may, certain complaints were received against the respondent No. 1 from the students regarding his misbehaviour. In the wake of these complaints, the respondent No. 1 tendered resignation on 16-8-1998. The resignation is addressed to the Chairman of the petitioner Institute. It clearly records that having regard to the serious allegations















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top