SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 282

R.G.DESHPANDE, P.S.BRAHME
Paras Ramprasad Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - BRAHME P.S., J.:---By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Paras s/o Ramprasad Sahu has challenged the detention order dated 12th August, 2002 passed by respondent No. 2, the District Magistrate, Wardha detaining the petitioner under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 (No. LV of 1981) (Amendment 1996) for short, hereinafter referred to as "the Act").

2. The detention order along with the grounds of detention also dated 12th August, 2002 was served on the petitioner on 13th August, 2002.

3. As could be seen from the grounds of detention, the Detaining Authority took into consideration the fact of petitioner's involvement in activities of bootleggers and engaging himself in contravention of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 and in all, eight cases under the Bombay Prohibition Act have been registered against him at Police Station, Wardha city and the petitioner has been continuously engaging himself in commission of violent and desperate acts such as house trespass, hurt, mischief, robbery, criminal intimidation etc.














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top