SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Bom) 53

D.D.SINHA, K.J.ROHEE
Lalit Kumar Purushottamdas Mohta – Appellant
Versus
Official Liquidator & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - SINHA D.D., J.:-Admit. Heard finally by consent of Shri Dharmadhikari, learned Counsel for the appellant, Miss Sharma, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 1, Shri Madnani, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 2, and Shri Bhangde, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 3.

2.Shri Dharmadhikari, learned Counsel for the appellant, states that M/s. Nav Bharat Trading Company had obtained a loan of Rs. 3,60,000/- in the year 1953 from the Laxmi Bank Ltd. Shri Gopaldas Mohta, grand-father of the appellant, was one of the Directors of the above referred company and he allegedly stood guarantor for the above mentioned loan. It is further alleged that shri Gopaldas Mohta had mortgaged two immovable properties known as "Mohta House" situated at Civil Lines, Nagpur and "Marble House" situated at Itwari, Nagpur. The aforesaid properties belong to M/s Gopaldasji Bulakidas Mohta, a HUF.

3.Learned Counsel Shri Dharmadhikari further states that respondent No. 1 had filed Official Liquidator's report No. 80/2002 in Company Petition No. 14/1960 stating therein that a sum of Rs. 2.5 crores approximately is to be received from Mohta family and details of the dues are given in the Officia





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top