SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 1014

V.M.KANADE
Salman Salim Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT - KANADE V.M., J.:---Rule. By consent returnable forthwith. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2. By an order dated 9th July, 2003, the matter was adjourned to 28th July, 2003 and by consent of parties, the matter is being finally disposed off at the admission stage itself.

3. The brief facts which are necessary for the purpose of deciding the present application are as under :-

The applicant is arraigned as an accused in Sessions Case No. 126 of 2003. The offence was registered by Bandra Police Station vide C.R. 326 of 2002 on 28th September, 2002 under section 304(A), 279, 337, 338, 427 of I.P.C. and sections 134(a) and (b) read with 181, 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1998 on a complaint of one Ravindra Patil, Police Constable attached to the Security Department, Social Security Branch No. 1. The case of the prosecution in brief is that the applicant is a film actor and he was provided with police security. The complainant was appointed as a security guard of the applicant. The incident in question took place on 27th September 2002. The complainant reported to duty at about 8.00 p.m. and, therefore, at 9.30 p.m. the applicant took out his Toyota Land Cruiser car









































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top