SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 659

P.S.BRAHME
Milind Atmaram Pawar & another – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT - BRAHME P.S., J.:---Heard Mr. Gandhi, the learned Counsel appearing for the applicants and Mr. Mirza, the learned A.P.P. for the non-applicant-State.

2. The present application is preferred by the applicants original accused in the Sessions Trial No. 200 of 1994 challenging the order passed by the Sessions Judge, Akola on 2-2-1999 whereunder the Sessions Court has quashed and set aside the order of committal passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Murtizapur, dt. 5-12-1994 and remanded back the entire proceedings to the Judicial Magistrate for holding the committal proceedings as per law.

3. Applicants were, in fact, tried before the learned Sessions Judge for the charge of committing murder of one Ramesh Ahire. One Lalita Ashok Tayade and her husband Ashok Tayade were also charge-sheeted along with the present applicants in Crime No. 202 of 1994 for murder of victim Ramesh. In that, Ashok Tayade was already discharged under section 169 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the Court in pursuance of the report made by the Investigating Officer. As per the prosecution case, victim Ramesh was done to death by the applicants and accused Lalita. Accused Lalita was grante









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top