SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 658

P.S.BRAHME
Wahidkhan Majidkhan – Appellant
Versus
Badreshmin Wahidkhan & another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - BRAHME P.S., J.:---This revision application is filed by applicant Wahidkhan Majidkhan challenging the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola in Criminal Revision Application No. 271 of 1998 on 7-4-99 whereunder the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 11, Akola in Misc. Criminal Case No. 169 of 1997, dated 5th August, 1998 is set aside. In effect, the prayer of the applicant for cancellation of maintenance has been rejected.

2. We have heard Mr. B.N. Mohta, the learned Counsel for non-applicant No. 1. None for the applicant No. 1.

3. Admittedly, the applicant was husband of non-applicant No. 1. Non-applicant No. 1 had filed Misc. Criminal Case No. 315 of 1993 in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Akola claiming maintenance under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The lower Court allowed the application and granted maintenance of Rs. 200/- p.m. to the non-applicant. The applicant had challenged that order of maintenance by preferring revision application before the Sessions Court. Admittedly, that revision application was dismissed and the order passed by the Magistrate granting maintenance came to be confirmed. Thereafte










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top