SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Bom) 182

D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
Bharat R. Desai & another – Appellant
Versus
Naina Mohanlal Bhal – Respondent


JUDGMENT - DR. CHANDRACHUD D.Y., J.:---This matter has been pending on Board for admission since March, 2003. Notice was issued on 16th April, 2003 and the proceedings in the suit before the Small Causes Court have been stayed. On 23rd July, 2003 notice was again issued for the specific purpose of informing the parties that the matter shall be heard and finally disposed of at the stage of admission. The matter has been adjourned on several occasions and was called out again yesterday. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners was heard. Counsel for the respondent was absent and the matter was accordingly directed to be placed for judgment today. However, Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners stated that he would personally inform the Advocate for the respondent so that if he desire to make any submissions before the dictation of the judgment commences this morning, he would be permitted to do so. Counsel for the petitioners has stated before the Court that he has personally informed the Advocate for the respondent that the matter is being again listed today on Board. Today when the matter has been called out, a rather unusual request has been made to the effect that t
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top