SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 525

R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, P.S.BRAHME
Shyamrao Kewalram Kapgatge & another – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Revenue & Forest Department & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - KHANDEPARKAR R.M.S., J.:---Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents.

2. The petitioners challenge the order passed by the Authorised Officer and confirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge in relation to the tractor and trolley which was seized by the Forest Officer in exercise of powers under section 52 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter to be referred to as "the Act"). The challenge is on two grounds, namely, that the transportation of firewood and the timber through the vehicle of the petitioners was under the bona fide belief that the same is being transported pursuant to the issuance of necessary transit pass and secondly, that the respondents themselves had admitted before the Magistrate that the wood transported through the vehicle of the petitioners was not from the Government land but it was from the private land.

3. Few facts relevant for the decision are that on 22-4-1988 the vehicle of the petitioner driven by himself was intercepted near village Kooba within the district of Bhandara, by the patrolling party of the forest department and was found transporting firewood and four logs o













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top