SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Bom) 1237

R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
Laxman R. Vajage & another – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Bombay & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - KHANDEPARKAR R.M.S., J.: - Since common question of law and facts arise in both these petitions, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. The petitioners challenge the orders passed by the respondents rejecting the applications for revalidation of their liquor permits-one in relation to country liquor, namely licence CL-III and another in relation to Indian made foreign liquor in the form of FL-II being totally arbitrary one and in contravention of the provisions of law.

3. The undisputed facts in both the petitions are that the applications for revalidation of the liquor licences of the petitioners, like many other applicants, during the relevant time, were rejected on the ground that they were filed beyond the cut-off date fixed by the Government for filing such application. It is the case of the respondents that the Government from time to time pursuant to the circulars issued had fixed the cut-off date for the purpose of filing applications for revalidation of the liquor licences which were not being utilised for number of years after having obtained such licences and the petitioners having not filed the applications for revalida
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top