SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Bom) 1261

P.S.BRAHME, B.R.GAVAI
Prabhakar Tulshiramji Mankar & others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - Brahme P.S., J.: - Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the record.

2. The petitioners have approached this Court challenging the orders passed by the respondent No. 2, suspending the licences of the petitioners as also the orders passed by the Appellate Authority. Confirming the said orders.

3. The petitioners are the licensees for sale, stock or exhibit for sale or distribution of Insecticides holding licence Nos. AMT/203, AMT/283, AMT 320, AMT/336 and AMT/66 respectively issued under section 13 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 read with sub-rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Rules framed thereunder. On 29th August, 1990, the petitioners received two packages each of sealed containers of insecticides called as "Nuvacron" (Monocrotophos) from Harhar Mahadeo Garage (Motor Transport Agency) of Amravati. It is not deputed that the packing material of the labels on the packages including the labels on the sealed containers were the same as of original packing material and labels of Hindustan Ciba Geigy Ltd., Bombay. Subsequently, the petitioners received bills for the said packages from M/s. Datta Krushi Mandir, Amravati. The petitioners, in fact, had never placed any orde




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top