SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Bom) 1065

F.I.REBELLO
Swan Mills Limited & another – Appellant
Versus
Sakharam Dhondu Panchal & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - REBELLO F.I., J.: - All these petitions are being disposed of by common order as they involve financial benefits to be paid to the respondents, consequent to the order passed in his favour by the Appellate Authority under the provisions of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act on 12-10-1985.

2. Writ Petition No. 255 of 2001 is by the Employer challenging the order of the Appellate Authority passed in Application IDA No. 646 of 1996 dated 30-10-2000. That order came to be passed in proceedings under section 33(C)(2) taken out by the respondents in terms of the order of the Appellate Authority allowing his application for setting aside the order of dismissal and consequential benefits. By the impugned order, the learned Labour Court has been pleased to direct the petitioners to deposit sum of Rs. 2,47,224/- which was payment of full back wages within a month from the date of the order failing which the said amount would carry interest at the rate of 9% p.a. whichever is earlier.

3. Writ Petition No. 256 of 2001 is by the employer challenging the order made by the Appellate Authority dated 10-10-2000 whereby appeals preferred by the petitioner as also by respondent No. 1 agains












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top