N.A.BRITTO
Ramkrishna Anand Raikar – Appellant
Versus
State & another – Respondent
2. Some facts are required to be stated to dispose off the present revision.
3. The applicant herein (applicant, for short) and his mother were the owners of a property surveyed under No. 16/3 of Village Murdda, Merces. The applicant had entered into an agreement with the respondent No. 2 ('respondent' for short) on or about 3rd August, 1995 regarding the development of the said property.
4. Disputes and differences arose between the said applicant and the said respondent in connection with the development of the said property as a result of which the respondent filed two suits. Civil Suit No. 138/03/A was filed in connection with revocation of power of attorney dated 13th June, 2002, on or about 4th December, 2003 and Civil Suit No. 45/04/B was filed in relation to a partition deed entered between the applicant and his mother. However, the filing of the said suits are not of relevance for the purpose of deciding the present revision.
5. The dispute which was the subject-matter of the proceedi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.