SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Bom) 1389

N.A.BRITTO
Ramkrishna Anand Raikar – Appellant
Versus
State & another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - BRITTO N.A., J.: - This revision is directed against the Judgment/Order dated 21st August, 2004 of the learned Sessions Judge, Panaji, in Criminal Revision Application No. 42 of 2004.

2. Some facts are required to be stated to dispose off the present revision.

3. The applicant herein (applicant, for short) and his mother were the owners of a property surveyed under No. 16/3 of Village Murdda, Merces. The applicant had entered into an agreement with the respondent No. 2 ('respondent' for short) on or about 3rd August, 1995 regarding the development of the said property.

4. Disputes and differences arose between the said applicant and the said respondent in connection with the development of the said property as a result of which the respondent filed two suits. Civil Suit No. 138/03/A was filed in connection with revocation of power of attorney dated 13th June, 2002, on or about 4th December, 2003 and Civil Suit No. 45/04/B was filed in relation to a partition deed entered between the applicant and his mother. However, the filing of the said suits are not of relevance for the purpose of deciding the present revision.

5. The dispute which was the subject-matter of the proceedi





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top